header-logo header-logo

Independent Living Fund closure challenge fails

10 December 2014
Issue: 7634 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Two severely disabled men who use the Independent Living Fund (ILF) have lost their bid to overturn the government’s decision to close the ILF in June 2015, after the High Court ruled former minister for disabled people Mike Penning had not breached equality laws. The claimants argued Penning did not have sufficient information to assess the practical effect of closure on ILF users. However, Mrs Justice Andrews ruled that Penning was made fully aware of “the inevitable and considerable adverse effect” of closure, in R (oao Aspinall) v Work and Pensions Secretary [2014] EWHC 4134 (Admin). 

 

Issue: 7634 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll