header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

InfoTrack rolls out upgraded digital conveyancing solution Property Report

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
28 May 2021
Categories: Legal News , Property , Conveyancing
printer mail-detail
Legal tech company InfoTrack has launched a number of enhancements to its digital conveyancing solution Property Report
Property Report is a tool allowing users to create a standardised title report in as little as 15 minutes, providing content tailored to title registers, conveyancing searches and stamp duty land tax (SDLT) in line with government guidance. Selecting applicable tenure types (including freehold, leasehold, new build, shared ownership, and underlease) allows the report to automatically insert or remove components based on relevancy, and extracting data directly from complementary title registers removes the need to copy and paste covenants, easements or rentcharges. Property Report also assesses the risk ratings of data from integrated environmental searches, and uses automation to report on SDLT.


Adrian Noble, managing director at Key Legal, commented: ‘It is clear that the system has been designed with the conveyancer in mind and is a significant time-saving tool. I have been completely sold on the benefits of Property Report. The report can be entirely amended as required and is updated in real time so that you can actually see how your amendments will appear within the report.’

Scott Bozinis, chief executive officer at InfoTrack, added: ‘Using Property Report provides transparent communication channels with your client, including disclaimers to mitigate risk for your firm and keep the buyer fully informed. InfoTrack’s automation allows conveyancers to apply their expertise and review SDLT information before purchaser-approval. Reporting on SDLT and Environmental Search data is no longer a time-consuming and complex task.’

Categories: Legal News , Property , Conveyancing
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Read All
Public Accounts Committee warn of ‘extinction’ risk for legal aid
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
NLJ this week: The insider returns
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
NLJ this week: Drawing the line on contempt
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
NLJ this week: Stop and search by the numbers
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
NLJ this week: Looking back on the prorogation that never was
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll