header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
28 May 2021
Categories: Legal News , Property , Conveyancing
printer mail-detail

InfoTrack rolls out upgraded digital conveyancing solution Property Report

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
Legal tech company InfoTrack has launched a number of enhancements to its digital conveyancing solution Property Report
Property Report is a tool allowing users to create a standardised title report in as little as 15 minutes, providing content tailored to title registers, conveyancing searches and stamp duty land tax (SDLT) in line with government guidance. Selecting applicable tenure types (including freehold, leasehold, new build, shared ownership, and underlease) allows the report to automatically insert or remove components based on relevancy, and extracting data directly from complementary title registers removes the need to copy and paste covenants, easements or rentcharges. Property Report also assesses the risk ratings of data from integrated environmental searches, and uses automation to report on SDLT.


Adrian Noble, managing director at Key Legal, commented: ‘It is clear that the system has been designed with the conveyancer in mind and is a significant time-saving tool. I have been completely sold on the benefits of Property Report. The report can be entirely amended as required and is updated in real time so that you can actually see how your amendments will appear within the report.’

Scott Bozinis, chief executive officer at InfoTrack, added: ‘Using Property Report provides transparent communication channels with your client, including disclaimers to mitigate risk for your firm and keep the buyer fully informed. InfoTrack’s automation allows conveyancers to apply their expertise and review SDLT information before purchaser-approval. Reporting on SDLT and Environmental Search data is no longer a time-consuming and complex task.’

Categories: Legal News , Property , Conveyancing
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: CPR tweak closes third-party disclosure gap
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
NLJ this week: Court of Appeals wrestles with Mazur fallout
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’
NLJ this week: Driving test fraudsters steer towards jail
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
NLJ this week: Deepfakes demand data law muscle
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
NLJ this week: 40% penalty for coercive control
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll