header-logo header-logo

Inheritance rights—Statutory next of kin—Right to family life

26 April 2012
Issue: 7511 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Re Erskine Trust [2012] EWHC 732 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 03 (Apr)

Chancery Division, Mark Herbert QC, 29 March 2012

The exclusion of adopted children from the definition of “statutory next of kin” in the Administration of Estates Act 1925 by the Adoption of Children Act 1926, s 5 was discriminatory and contrary to the prohibition in Art 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Edward Hewitt (instructed by Veale Wasbrough Vizards) for the trustees. David Rowell (instructed by Veale Wasbrough Vizards) for C and S. Charles Holbeach (instructed by Veale Wasbrough Vizards) for M.

The issue raised in the instant case was the construction of the phrase “statutory next of kin” in an English settlement made in 1948 and the possible retrospective effect of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) on that construction. In 1948, the deceased, DM, made a settlement in respect of which a trust fund worth approximately £3.2m was set up (the trust). The beneficiary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll