header-logo header-logo

26 April 2012
Issue: 7511 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Inheritance rights—Statutory next of kin—Right to family life

Re Erskine Trust [2012] EWHC 732 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 03 (Apr)

Chancery Division, Mark Herbert QC, 29 March 2012

The exclusion of adopted children from the definition of “statutory next of kin” in the Administration of Estates Act 1925 by the Adoption of Children Act 1926, s 5 was discriminatory and contrary to the prohibition in Art 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Edward Hewitt (instructed by Veale Wasbrough Vizards) for the trustees. David Rowell (instructed by Veale Wasbrough Vizards) for C and S. Charles Holbeach (instructed by Veale Wasbrough Vizards) for M.

The issue raised in the instant case was the construction of the phrase “statutory next of kin” in an English settlement made in 1948 and the possible retrospective effect of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) on that construction. In 1948, the deceased, DM, made a settlement in respect of which a trust fund worth approximately £3.2m was set up (the trust). The beneficiary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll