header-logo header-logo

13 March 2008 / Emma King , Richard Burger
Issue: 7312 / Categories: Features , Banking
printer mail-detail

An inside job?

Richard Burger and Emma King examine the initial impact of the FSA as the lead prosecutor of insider dealing

In late January 2008 two individuals appeared at City of London Magistrates’ Court charged with insider dealing contrary to s 52 of the Criminal Justice Act 1993 (CJA 2003). Such prosecutions are infrequent and therefore attract attention, however, what made this case even more of interest was that it represents the first ever prosecution by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) for insider dealing (“FSA steps up insider dealing offensive” NLJ, 1 February 2008, p 160).

Although historically prosecuted by the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) (now the Department for Business, Enterprise & Regulatory Reform) and the Serious Fraud Office (SFO), the FSA is now recognised as the lead investigator and prosecutor for insider dealing. Recently the FSA has made cold-calls to investors and traders requesting information, under caution, on specific trades and the reasons behind these trades. 

Section 402 of Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA 2000) provides the FSA with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll