header-logo header-logo

An inside job?

13 March 2008 / Emma King , Richard Burger
Issue: 7312 / Categories: Features , Banking
printer mail-detail

Richard Burger and Emma King examine the initial impact of the FSA as the lead prosecutor of insider dealing

In late January 2008 two individuals appeared at City of London Magistrates’ Court charged with insider dealing contrary to s 52 of the Criminal Justice Act 1993 (CJA 2003). Such prosecutions are infrequent and therefore attract attention, however, what made this case even more of interest was that it represents the first ever prosecution by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) for insider dealing (“FSA steps up insider dealing offensive” NLJ, 1 February 2008, p 160).

Although historically prosecuted by the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) (now the Department for Business, Enterprise & Regulatory Reform) and the Serious Fraud Office (SFO), the FSA is now recognised as the lead investigator and prosecutor for insider dealing. Recently the FSA has made cold-calls to investors and traders requesting information, under caution, on specific trades and the reasons behind these trades. 

Section 402 of Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA 2000) provides the FSA with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll