header-logo header-logo

30 June 2011
Issue: 7472 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Insolvency

Re Derfshaw Ltd and others [2011] EWHC 1565 (Ch), [2011] All ER (D) 144 (Jun)

The court was concerned with whether it had jurisdiction to make an administration order retrospectively, and if so, whether it should exercise that jurisdiction to make such an order. Consideration was given to G-Tech Construction Ltd [2007] BPIR 1275 (G-Tech) in which the judge had taken the view, inter alia, that the court did have power pursuant to para 13 of Sch B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 to make a retrospective order, and to declare that the earlier actions of the persons who were purportedly administrators at the earlier time should be ratified as valid in all respects. In allowing the application, the court held that the lead of G-Tech would be followed. 
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
Britain’s new acknowledgement that Israel’s occupation is unlawful, and accompanying settlement-goods ban and sanctions, is significant but overdue, argue Danny Friedman KC and Victor Kattan in NLJ this week
New planning fee rises, wider trade union access rights and a service-by-email trap feature in Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
back-to-top-scroll