header-logo header-logo

Insolvency

30 June 2011
Issue: 7472 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Re Derfshaw Ltd and others [2011] EWHC 1565 (Ch), [2011] All ER (D) 144 (Jun)

The court was concerned with whether it had jurisdiction to make an administration order retrospectively, and if so, whether it should exercise that jurisdiction to make such an order. Consideration was given to G-Tech Construction Ltd [2007] BPIR 1275 (G-Tech) in which the judge had taken the view, inter alia, that the court did have power pursuant to para 13 of Sch B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 to make a retrospective order, and to declare that the earlier actions of the persons who were purportedly administrators at the earlier time should be ratified as valid in all respects. In allowing the application, the court held that the lead of G-Tech would be followed. 
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll