header-logo header-logo

Insolvency

30 May 2013
Issue: 7562 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

HSBC Bank plc v Tambrook Jersey Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 576, [2013] All ER (D) 247 (May)

The High Court had held that, pursuant to s 426 of the Insolvency Act 1986, it did not have jurisdiction to make an order to “assist” a foreign court which was not actually doing anything in its insolvency jurisdiction: the English court was not being asked to assist the Royal Court of Jersey in any endeavour; it was being asked to provide insolvency proceedings in lieu of any Jersey insolvency proceedings. Consequently, the jurisdictional threshold in s 426 was not crossed. In allowing the appeal, the Court of Appeal held that s 426(4) was not, by its actual working, applicable only to courts exercising jurisdiction in relation to insolvency law; it was applicable to courts having jurisdiction, or the corresponding jurisdiction, in insolvency law. Under established authorities, s 426(4) and (5) were to be given a broad interpretation.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll