header-logo header-logo

Insolvency

11 July 2013
Issue: 7568 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Wood and another v Gorbunova and others [2013] EWHC 1935 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 83 (Jul)

Following the death of Boris Berezovsky, court-appointed receivers applied to the court for an order directing that the sums which they would have to pay to the respondent third parties and their own costs and expenses in connection with the application should be paid out of the assets of B’s estate. The Chancery Division held that it should treat a receiver appointed by the court in relation to an application made by such a receiver against a third party in the same way as with litigants in other capacities such as a liquidator, a trustee or a personal representative who initiated proceedings against a third party. It was a basic principle of receivership that the receiver was entitled to be indemnified in respect of his costs and expenses. The receivers were entitled to indemnify themselves out of the assets of the estate to the extent of two thirds of the costs they had to pay one respondent. In respect of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll