header-logo header-logo

11 July 2013
Issue: 7568 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Insolvency

Wood and another v Gorbunova and others [2013] EWHC 1935 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 83 (Jul)

Following the death of Boris Berezovsky, court-appointed receivers applied to the court for an order directing that the sums which they would have to pay to the respondent third parties and their own costs and expenses in connection with the application should be paid out of the assets of B’s estate. The Chancery Division held that it should treat a receiver appointed by the court in relation to an application made by such a receiver against a third party in the same way as with litigants in other capacities such as a liquidator, a trustee or a personal representative who initiated proceedings against a third party. It was a basic principle of receivership that the receiver was entitled to be indemnified in respect of his costs and expenses. The receivers were entitled to indemnify themselves out of the assets of the estate to the extent of two thirds of the costs they had to pay one respondent. In respect of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll