header-logo header-logo

26 June 2017
Issue: 7750 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Insolvency

Co-Operative Bank plc v Phillips [2017] EWHC 1320 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 50 (Jun)

The Chancery Division ruled that a district judge had erred in excepting, from a summary judgment in favour of the bank, the defendant’s claim against the bank that the effect of an individual voluntary arrangement (IVA) was that any claims, which the bank had against him, were time-barred.
 
The underlying claim by the bank was for possession of two properties, in respect of which charges had been granted to the bank, as part security for loans to the defendant’s company.
 
The court allowed the bank’s appeal, in part, in circumstances where the IVA had not been terminated by certificate, but by effluxion of time, and held that there would be a complete summary judgment in favour of the bank.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—five appointments

Switalskis—five appointments

Firm expands national abuse compensation team

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

IP firm announces new partners and senior promotions across UK offices

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen promotes five lawyers to the partnership

NEWS
A High Court ruling has sent a jolt through the legal profession after a newly qualified solicitor used an internal AI tool to produce court correspondence containing a fabricated legal citation
A significant data privacy ruling has clarified what counts as valid consent under UK data protection law
Executors may be overlooking billions of pounds in estate assets hidden in forgotten investments and misplaced share certificates
Britain’s booming non-surgical cosmetics market is operating in what some critics describe as a regulatory ‘Wild West’
Family contact disputes are becoming an increasingly prominent feature of Court of Protection litigation
back-to-top-scroll