header-logo header-logo

26 June 2017
Issue: 7750 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Insolvency

Co-Operative Bank plc v Phillips [2017] EWHC 1320 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 50 (Jun)

The Chancery Division ruled that a district judge had erred in excepting, from a summary judgment in favour of the bank, the defendant’s claim against the bank that the effect of an individual voluntary arrangement (IVA) was that any claims, which the bank had against him, were time-barred.
 
The underlying claim by the bank was for possession of two properties, in respect of which charges had been granted to the bank, as part security for loans to the defendant’s company.
 
The court allowed the bank’s appeal, in part, in circumstances where the IVA had not been terminated by certificate, but by effluxion of time, and held that there would be a complete summary judgment in favour of the bank.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Flint Bishop—Charlotte Harris

Flint Bishop—Charlotte Harris

Sheffield expansion continues with appointment of commercial property partner

Browne Jacobson—Paul Duggan

Browne Jacobson—Paul Duggan

Browne Jacobson strengthens banking and finance practice with latest partner appointment Paul Duggan

Ward Hadaway—Chris Piggott

Ward Hadaway—Chris Piggott

Employment partner joins Ward Hadaway

NEWS
Mr Justice Nicklin’s decision to order costs on an indemnity basis may be a ‘significant win’ but it’s still ‘far from game, set and match’ for Associated Newspapers, a former costs judge has said
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll