header-logo header-logo

26 June 2017
Issue: 7750 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Insolvency

Co-Operative Bank plc v Phillips [2017] EWHC 1320 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 50 (Jun)

The Chancery Division ruled that a district judge had erred in excepting, from a summary judgment in favour of the bank, the defendant’s claim against the bank that the effect of an individual voluntary arrangement (IVA) was that any claims, which the bank had against him, were time-barred.
 
The underlying claim by the bank was for possession of two properties, in respect of which charges had been granted to the bank, as part security for loans to the defendant’s company.
 
The court allowed the bank’s appeal, in part, in circumstances where the IVA had not been terminated by certificate, but by effluxion of time, and held that there would be a complete summary judgment in favour of the bank.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
The controversial Mazur ruling, which caused widespread uncertainty about the role of non-solicitors in litigation work, has been overturned on appeal
Two landmark social media cases in the US could influence social media regulation in the UK, lawyers predict
Barristers have urged the government to set up Nightingale-style specialist courts, with jury trials, to prioritise rape, sexual assault and domestic abuse trials
Victims of violent crimes who suffer life-changing injuries receive less than half the financial support today than those in the 1990s, according to a senior personal injury lawyer
Rising numbers of cases, an increase in litigants in person and an overall lack of investment is piling pressure on the family court, the Law Society has warned
back-to-top-scroll