header-logo header-logo

Insolvency—Debt relief orders—Recovery of benefits during moratorium period

05 January 2012
Issue: 7495 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne and another [2011] UKSC 60, [2011] All ER (D) 94 (Dec)

Supreme Court, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson SCJJ, 14 Dec 2011

The secretary of state for work and pensions cannot continue to recoup social fund loans and benefit overpayments by deduction from current benefit payments during the moratorium period after the making of a debt relief order (DRO) under Pt 7A of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986).

Clive Sheldon QC and Denis Edwards (instructed by the Department for Work and Pensions Legal Service) for the secretary of state. Richard Drabble QC and Desmond Rutledge (instructed by Edwards Duthie) for P. Richard Drabble QC and Paul Stagg (instructed by Public Law Project) for C.

The DRO scheme was introduced into IA 1986 by the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 and came into force in February 2009. When a DRO was made, a moratorium commenced on the effective date

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll