header-logo header-logo

10 November 2016
Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

Insolvency lawyers reassured on English courts & Brexit

Recent innovations such as insolvency express trials and the financial list have been successful, the new Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Geoffrey Vos has said. He also provided reassurance on the impact of Brexit.

Speaking to the Insolvency Lawyers’ Association this week, Sir Geoffrey paid tribute to the “inherent unbreakable strengths” of the English legal system and urged lawyers to be positive about the future of UK Plc.

One recent “huge success” for the courts was the introduction of the Financial List on 1 October 2015, which “uses the most highly qualified judges from both the Chancery Division and the Commercial Court and offers the twin advantages of speed and efficiency”, he said.

“So far some 22 cases have been started or transferred into the Financial List, and four judgments have been handed down. Four have been resolved in other ways and 14 are still ongoing.”

Another success has been the introduction of insolvency express trials (IETs) in April 2016, which are designed to speed up simple litigation valued at less than £75,000, curb costs and avoid the additional burdens of costs budgeting in appropriate cases.

“In insolvency cases in particular, there is often little need for interlocutory case management, because the case turns on evidence, not complex pleadings,” he said.

“Disclosure is usually confined, because both sides are largely dependent on common documentary sources originating from the company and in the hands of the officeholder.”

The shorter trials scheme, which has no financial limit, has also been successful in the Rolls Building jurisdictions. Uptake is growing rapidly both this and for IETs, he said.

On Brexit, Sir Geoffrey said the courts had to deal with the obvious problems of ensuring their judgments could be enforced within the EU when the UK is no longer a member, and with the fact that the UK will no longer be bound by the EU Insolvency Regulation so that its insolvency proceedings will no longer be automatically recognised in the EU Member States.

“But these and many other questions can be resolved and while no final determinations have yet been made, you may rest assured that these issues are being given careful and detailed consideration by the judiciary and by the government, who are looking for simple and practical solutions,” he said.

As for arbitration, he said he saw no reason why the UK’s position as world leader in the field should change provided commercial parties are still prepared to choose English law and English jurisdiction. This was because “the rule of law and the integrity of judges is a vital component for businessmen in all fields when choosing where to resolve their disputes”.

Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll