header-logo header-logo

10 November 2016
Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

Insolvency lawyers reassured on English courts & Brexit

Recent innovations such as insolvency express trials and the financial list have been successful, the new Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Geoffrey Vos has said. He also provided reassurance on the impact of Brexit.

Speaking to the Insolvency Lawyers’ Association this week, Sir Geoffrey paid tribute to the “inherent unbreakable strengths” of the English legal system and urged lawyers to be positive about the future of UK Plc.

One recent “huge success” for the courts was the introduction of the Financial List on 1 October 2015, which “uses the most highly qualified judges from both the Chancery Division and the Commercial Court and offers the twin advantages of speed and efficiency”, he said.

“So far some 22 cases have been started or transferred into the Financial List, and four judgments have been handed down. Four have been resolved in other ways and 14 are still ongoing.”

Another success has been the introduction of insolvency express trials (IETs) in April 2016, which are designed to speed up simple litigation valued at less than £75,000, curb costs and avoid the additional burdens of costs budgeting in appropriate cases.

“In insolvency cases in particular, there is often little need for interlocutory case management, because the case turns on evidence, not complex pleadings,” he said.

“Disclosure is usually confined, because both sides are largely dependent on common documentary sources originating from the company and in the hands of the officeholder.”

The shorter trials scheme, which has no financial limit, has also been successful in the Rolls Building jurisdictions. Uptake is growing rapidly both this and for IETs, he said.

On Brexit, Sir Geoffrey said the courts had to deal with the obvious problems of ensuring their judgments could be enforced within the EU when the UK is no longer a member, and with the fact that the UK will no longer be bound by the EU Insolvency Regulation so that its insolvency proceedings will no longer be automatically recognised in the EU Member States.

“But these and many other questions can be resolved and while no final determinations have yet been made, you may rest assured that these issues are being given careful and detailed consideration by the judiciary and by the government, who are looking for simple and practical solutions,” he said.

As for arbitration, he said he saw no reason why the UK’s position as world leader in the field should change provided commercial parties are still prepared to choose English law and English jurisdiction. This was because “the rule of law and the integrity of judges is a vital component for businessmen in all fields when choosing where to resolve their disputes”.

Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll