header-logo header-logo

17 July 2009 / Julian Samiloff
Issue: 7378 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Insufficient sunlight?

Sunlight is the best of disinfectants, or is it? asks Julian Samiloff

From the prime minister being pressured into creating a public inquiry into the war in Iraq, to the 30-year struggle to expose the suppressed facts of the alleged killing of Blaire Peach by police officers in Southall in 1979, the quote from Louis Brandeis—US Supreme Court Justice, still manifests a truth—“Sunlight”, he stated, “is said to be the best of disinfectants”—“publicity is justly commended as a remedy for social, legal and industrial injustice”.

Whether it be rail disasters—Ladbroke Grove—NHS and social services failures—Climbie and Bristol Royal Infirmary—or  even the Shipman Inquiry—governmental sponsored inquiries—held in public or in private are, in my view, an essential part of our society’s democratic and rule of law obligation to investigate particular events of significant public concern. Inquiries can ensure that lessons are learned by making recommendations for change, give voice to those who have suffered—so aiding social and individual psychological healing and—I would argue—provide fulfilment of the notion that those responsible are held to account.

The key statutory

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll