header-logo header-logo

23 April 2010
Issue: 7414 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Insurance

Jones v Environcom Ltd and another. MS PLC t/a Miles Smith Insurance Brokers, third party, [2010] EWHC 759 (Comm), [2010] All ER (D) 76 (Apr)

A broker had to take reasonable steps to ensure that a proposed policy was suitable for the insured’s needs.

By definition a policy which was voidable for non-disclosure was not suitable. In order to ensure a policy was suitable, a broker had an obligation to advise the insured of the duty to disclose all material circumstances and the consequences of not doing so, he had to indicate the sort of matters which ought to be disclosed as being material and had to take reasonable care to elicit matters which ought to be disclosed but which the insured might not think necessary to mention. In order to discharge the duty to disclose, it was not sufficient to rely upon written standard form explanations and warnings annexed to proposals or policy documents. The broker had to satisfy himself that the position was in fact understood by the insured and that would usually require a specific oral

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll