header-logo header-logo

24 February 2011
Issue: 7454 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Insurance

Re Sompo Japan Insurance Inc [2011] EWHC 260 (Ch), [2011] All ER (D) 185 (Feb)

In considering whether to exercise its discretion by sanctioning an insurance business transfer scheme, ultimately what the court was concerned with was whether the scheme was fair as between different classes of affected persons, and in arriving at a conclusion as to whether or not it was, among the most important material before the court was material which the Act required to be before it, namely the report of an independent actuary as to his opinion on the scheme.

Further, the court had recognised that a reduction in the security level of transferred policies was not automatically and in every case unfair to the transferring policyholders, either viewed separately, or in the context of the realisation of some commercial objective of the proponents. The strict regulation of the conduct of insurance business in the UK, supervised by the FSA, required specified levels of security to be maintained by insurers but, provided that those levels were not adversely impacted, an insurer was in principle at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll