header-logo header-logo

Insurance surgery: liability & multi-party accidents abroad

16 February 2017 / Kelvin Farmaner
Issue: 7735 / Categories: Features , Insurance surgery , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail
nlj_7735_farmaner

The Court of Appeal has provided welcome clarity on determining which laws should apply in cross-border cases, says Kelvin Farmaner

  • Art 4(3) of Rome II in multi-tort cases.
  • When determining the applicable law, it is relevant to look at all of the claims against the other parties not just the specific claim advanced against the defendant in question.

The growth of international travel for both work and pleasure has meant the number of injury claims relating to accidents abroad has increased. However, the fact that an accident occurred abroad may create a number of difficulties. One such difficulty is the question of which law will apply to the resulting claims. For all accidents occurring after 11 January 2009, this is governed by Regulation (EC) 864/2007 (known as Rome II); Art 4 of which deals with choice of law and sets out a general principle, an exception and an escape clause.

The general principle: Art 4(1)

The general principle is that the applicable law will be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll