header-logo header-logo

Insurance surgery: liability & multi-party accidents abroad

16 February 2017 / Kelvin Farmaner
Issue: 7735 / Categories: Features , Insurance surgery , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail
nlj_7735_farmaner

The Court of Appeal has provided welcome clarity on determining which laws should apply in cross-border cases, says Kelvin Farmaner

  • Art 4(3) of Rome II in multi-tort cases.
  • When determining the applicable law, it is relevant to look at all of the claims against the other parties not just the specific claim advanced against the defendant in question.

The growth of international travel for both work and pleasure has meant the number of injury claims relating to accidents abroad has increased. However, the fact that an accident occurred abroad may create a number of difficulties. One such difficulty is the question of which law will apply to the resulting claims. For all accidents occurring after 11 January 2009, this is governed by Regulation (EC) 864/2007 (known as Rome II); Art 4 of which deals with choice of law and sets out a general principle, an exception and an escape clause.

The general principle: Art 4(1)

The general principle is that the applicable law will be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll