header-logo header-logo

18 August 2015 / Iain Stark
Issue: 7665 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Insurance surgery , Costs
printer mail-detail

Insurance surgery: Patience is a virtue

Taking time with costs budgeting pays off, says Iain Stark

Costs’ reserving and budgeting is never far from the mind of the conscientious fee earner conducting litigation.

In the Cat PI forum we are attuned to the fact that costs budgeting applies to cases issued after 1 April 2013. Unfortunately, there is a distinct lack of consistency by different courts in particular after directions questionnaires have been filed in terms of the orders received. It is apparent that the inconsistencies place fee earners in a predicament about what to actually prepare, some courts appear to require very little to be filed in advance of the costs & case management hearing, while others require Precedent H forms, observations of agreement/disagreement and combined summaries. 

Costs management is here to stay and this enables the parties to assist the courts in managing the litigation and controlling the costs spend. A statement of truth cannot be viewed as an empty formality and the significance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll