header-logo header-logo

18 August 2015 / Iain Stark
Issue: 7665 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Insurance surgery , Costs
printer mail-detail

Insurance surgery: Patience is a virtue

Taking time with costs budgeting pays off, says Iain Stark

Costs’ reserving and budgeting is never far from the mind of the conscientious fee earner conducting litigation.

In the Cat PI forum we are attuned to the fact that costs budgeting applies to cases issued after 1 April 2013. Unfortunately, there is a distinct lack of consistency by different courts in particular after directions questionnaires have been filed in terms of the orders received. It is apparent that the inconsistencies place fee earners in a predicament about what to actually prepare, some courts appear to require very little to be filed in advance of the costs & case management hearing, while others require Precedent H forms, observations of agreement/disagreement and combined summaries. 

Costs management is here to stay and this enables the parties to assist the courts in managing the litigation and controlling the costs spend. A statement of truth cannot be viewed as an empty formality and the significance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll