header-logo header-logo

Insurance surgery: A revolutionary trigger?

02 June 2015 / Joshua Munro
Issue: 7656 / Categories: Features , Insurance surgery , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Joshua Munro introduces a first for English law: the equitable right of an insurer to compensation from its own insured in respect of the claim on the policy

As if the forthcoming advent of the Insurance Act 2015 were not excitement enough for insurance lawyers, on 20 May 2015 the Supreme Court gave judgment in International Energy Group v Zurich [2015] UKSC 33, [2015] All ER (D) 170 (May), an extremely important decision on employers’ liability policies and annual policies generally.

Facts of the case

The problem faced by the court was as follows. IEG is an energy firm and employer in Guernsey. For a period of over 27 years from 1961 to 1988, IEG's predecessor firm employed Mr Carré and exposed him to asbestos dust. Carré subsequently contracted and died of mesothelioma. 

On 22 September 2008 Carré brought proceedings against IEG claiming that he had sustained mesothelioma consequent on his exposure to asbestos dust throughout his 27-year period of employment with GGLCL. IEG settled his claim on 19 December 2008

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll