header-logo header-logo

Insurance surgery: A revolutionary trigger?

02 June 2015 / Joshua Munro
Issue: 7656 / Categories: Features , Insurance surgery , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Joshua Munro introduces a first for English law: the equitable right of an insurer to compensation from its own insured in respect of the claim on the policy

As if the forthcoming advent of the Insurance Act 2015 were not excitement enough for insurance lawyers, on 20 May 2015 the Supreme Court gave judgment in International Energy Group v Zurich [2015] UKSC 33, [2015] All ER (D) 170 (May), an extremely important decision on employers’ liability policies and annual policies generally.

Facts of the case

The problem faced by the court was as follows. IEG is an energy firm and employer in Guernsey. For a period of over 27 years from 1961 to 1988, IEG's predecessor firm employed Mr Carré and exposed him to asbestos dust. Carré subsequently contracted and died of mesothelioma. 

On 22 September 2008 Carré brought proceedings against IEG claiming that he had sustained mesothelioma consequent on his exposure to asbestos dust throughout his 27-year period of employment with GGLCL. IEG settled his claim on 19 December 2008

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll