header-logo header-logo

02 June 2015 / Joshua Munro
Issue: 7656 / Categories: Features , Insurance surgery , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Insurance surgery: A revolutionary trigger?

Joshua Munro introduces a first for English law: the equitable right of an insurer to compensation from its own insured in respect of the claim on the policy

As if the forthcoming advent of the Insurance Act 2015 were not excitement enough for insurance lawyers, on 20 May 2015 the Supreme Court gave judgment in International Energy Group v Zurich [2015] UKSC 33, [2015] All ER (D) 170 (May), an extremely important decision on employers’ liability policies and annual policies generally.

Facts of the case

The problem faced by the court was as follows. IEG is an energy firm and employer in Guernsey. For a period of over 27 years from 1961 to 1988, IEG's predecessor firm employed Mr Carré and exposed him to asbestos dust. Carré subsequently contracted and died of mesothelioma. 

On 22 September 2008 Carré brought proceedings against IEG claiming that he had sustained mesothelioma consequent on his exposure to asbestos dust throughout his 27-year period of employment with GGLCL. IEG settled his claim on 19 December 2008

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll