header-logo header-logo

Insurance surgery: Tackling fundamental dishonesty

Stratos Gatzouris considers the implications of the forthcoming obligation on courts to strike out PI claims found to be fundamentally dishonest

On 13 April 2015, s 57 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 (CJCA 2015) will come into force. It places an obligation on courts to strike out personal injury claims which are found to be fundamentally dishonest.

What is fundamental dishonesty?

The concept of fundamental dishonesty was introduced by CPR 44.16(1) as an exception to qualified one way costs shifting (QOCS) in personal injury claims. A claimant will not benefit from QOCS if, on application by the defendant, the claimant is found to have been fundamentally dishonest. In such circumstances, an order for costs may be enforced against the claimant.

The term has since been incorporated into section 57 of CJCA 2015 and will apply to all proceedings issued on or after 13 April 2015. 

What does the new law say?

Section 57 places a duty on courts to strike out a personal injury claim, if, on application

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters Private Equity expertise with the appointment of James Paterson

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons strengthens Rural Affairs team with senior appointment

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley adds insurance mergers and acquisitions partner to London office

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll