header-logo header-logo

21 October 2010 / Clare Renton
Issue: 7438 / Categories: Features , EU , Family
printer mail-detail

International affairs

In the first of a regular series of updates, Clare Renton provides an overview of the most influential international & EU cases of 2010

The growth in number of international families and the consequent family law problems are not the preserve of the rich or famous. The clients whose cases were reported in 2010 could have presented in the office of any family lawyer. Often their problems require urgent action, but in the knowledge that an error of judgment or action taken with insufficient focus on discretion, as opposed to valour, could cause mayhem.    

M v V [2010] EWHC 1453 (Fam), [2010] All ER (D) 216 (Jun)

Brussels 1 Council Regulation 44/2001/EC, Art 23; Children Act 1989, Sch 1

The parties Algerian father and French mother agreed that that they would not seek maintenance in England. They agreed maintenance and all matters in France and embodied their agreement in a French court order. They included by agreement an exclusive jurisdiction clause in the agreement under the Brussels 1 Council Regulation 44/2001/EC,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll