header-logo header-logo

International arbitration: striking a balance

23 July 2021 / Joseph Dyke , Aqeel Qureshi
Issue: 7942 / Categories: Features , Arbitration , International justice
printer mail-detail
53336
Joseph Dyke & Aqeel Qureshi report on the approach to the exclusion of illegally obtained evidence in England & Wales & in international arbitration
  • Illegally obtained evidence.
  • The position in the English jurisdiction.
  • The position in international arbitration.

Arbitral tribunals enjoy broad discretion regarding admissibility of illegally obtained evidence and recent revisions to the IBA’s rules reflect this. While there is no definitive answer as to when such evidence will be excluded, comparing the approach in English litigation with that of international arbitration reveals circumstances where such exclusion may occur under the new revisions.

Illegally obtained evidence

The IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration are widely used in international arbitration. On 17 February 2021, amendments to these rules entered into force.

The amendments include the introduction of Art 9.3 which states that a tribunal ‘may, at the request of a Party or on its own motion, exclude evidence obtained illegally’. Thus, the 2020 Rules expressly provide a power to exclude such

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll