header-logo header-logo

23 July 2021 / Joseph Dyke , Aqeel Qureshi
Issue: 7942 / Categories: Features , Arbitration , International justice
printer mail-detail

International arbitration: striking a balance

53336
Joseph Dyke & Aqeel Qureshi report on the approach to the exclusion of illegally obtained evidence in England & Wales & in international arbitration
  • Illegally obtained evidence.
  • The position in the English jurisdiction.
  • The position in international arbitration.

Arbitral tribunals enjoy broad discretion regarding admissibility of illegally obtained evidence and recent revisions to the IBA’s rules reflect this. While there is no definitive answer as to when such evidence will be excluded, comparing the approach in English litigation with that of international arbitration reveals circumstances where such exclusion may occur under the new revisions.

Illegally obtained evidence

The IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration are widely used in international arbitration. On 17 February 2021, amendments to these rules entered into force.

The amendments include the introduction of Art 9.3 which states that a tribunal ‘may, at the request of a Party or on its own motion, exclude evidence obtained illegally’. Thus, the 2020 Rules expressly provide a power to exclude such

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll