header-logo header-logo

International arbitration: striking a balance

23 July 2021 / Joseph Dyke , Aqeel Qureshi
Issue: 7942 / Categories: Features , Arbitration , International justice
printer mail-detail
53336
Joseph Dyke & Aqeel Qureshi report on the approach to the exclusion of illegally obtained evidence in England & Wales & in international arbitration
  • Illegally obtained evidence.
  • The position in the English jurisdiction.
  • The position in international arbitration.

Arbitral tribunals enjoy broad discretion regarding admissibility of illegally obtained evidence and recent revisions to the IBA’s rules reflect this. While there is no definitive answer as to when such evidence will be excluded, comparing the approach in English litigation with that of international arbitration reveals circumstances where such exclusion may occur under the new revisions.

Illegally obtained evidence

The IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration are widely used in international arbitration. On 17 February 2021, amendments to these rules entered into force.

The amendments include the introduction of Art 9.3 which states that a tribunal ‘may, at the request of a Party or on its own motion, exclude evidence obtained illegally’. Thus, the 2020 Rules expressly provide a power to exclude such evidence, whereas

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll