header-logo header-logo

International arbitration: striking a balance

23 July 2021 / Joseph Dyke , Aqeel Qureshi
Issue: 7942 / Categories: Features , Arbitration , International justice
printer mail-detail
53336
Joseph Dyke & Aqeel Qureshi report on the approach to the exclusion of illegally obtained evidence in England & Wales & in international arbitration
  • Illegally obtained evidence.
  • The position in the English jurisdiction.
  • The position in international arbitration.

Arbitral tribunals enjoy broad discretion regarding admissibility of illegally obtained evidence and recent revisions to the IBA’s rules reflect this. While there is no definitive answer as to when such evidence will be excluded, comparing the approach in English litigation with that of international arbitration reveals circumstances where such exclusion may occur under the new revisions.

Illegally obtained evidence

The IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration are widely used in international arbitration. On 17 February 2021, amendments to these rules entered into force.

The amendments include the introduction of Art 9.3 which states that a tribunal ‘may, at the request of a Party or on its own motion, exclude evidence obtained illegally’. Thus, the 2020 Rules expressly provide a power to exclude such evidence, whereas

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Jersey litigation lead appointed to global STEP Council

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

Firm invests in future talent with new training cohort

NEWS
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
back-to-top-scroll