header-logo header-logo

26 July 2019 / Christian Wisskirchen
Categories: Opinion , Profession , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

International special: Open for business

Christian Wisskirchen explains why doing legal business in the UK post-Brexit makes sense

Since the EU Referendum in the UK three years ago, many law firms and in-house counsel around the world have been asking themselves whether it may be advisable for their clients to continue using English law in their international contracts and whether to continue to resolve their disputes in our jurisdiction.

Understandably, there has been significant marketing activity, notably by legal stakeholders in leading EU jurisdictions, advising international clients to move away from the use of English law and jurisdiction because of the perceived ‘uncertainty’ arising from Brexit. Let me be crystal clear: whereas there exists uncertainty in relation to economic and regulatory EU-UK cross-border issues, there is no uncertainty whatsoever in relation to the use and the usefulness of English law and dispute resolution in the English Courts. EU law simply does not apply to commercial contracts and to commercial dispute resolution.

"The Bar has successfully positioned itself in a turnkey role to access English and international
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Ashurst's Chief Risk Officer joins Walkers

Excello Law—John Osborne

Excello Law—John Osborne

Northern family lawyer John Osborne joins Excello

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

Trio of promotions announced at Kidderminster law firm mfg Solicitors

NEWS
A sole director can conspire with their own company for the purposes of the tort of unlawful means conspiracy, the High Court has ruled in a judgment with potentially wide implications for business disputes
The Court of Appeal has reinforced that domicile depends on intention rather than residence alone, in a significant post-Brexit ruling on cross-border financial remedy claims
The Chancery Division's long history comes to an end this autumn as it is reborn as the Business and Property Division, prompting questions over whether the shake-up is really necessary
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
back-to-top-scroll