header-logo header-logo

20 February 2026 / Ann Stanyer
Issue: 8150 / Categories: Features , Court of Protection , Profession , Mental health , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Is your LPA gathering dust?

242969
Lasting powers of attorney & letters of wishes should evolve with a client’s life. Regular reviews can prevent family disputes, court intervention & costly mistakes, writes Ann Stanyer
  • Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) should be reviewed at least every five years—and after any major life event—to ensure attorneys remain appropriate and arrangements still reflect the client’s wishes.
  • Thoughtful selection of attorneys, clear restrictions within the LPA, and a well-drafted letter of wishes can prevent misunderstandings, misuse of powers and costly Court of Protection disputes.
  • Proactive conversations about care, finances and decision-making reduce the risk of family conflict and court intervention if capacity is lost.

As 2026 gets underway, now is the time to review important documents, including powers of attorney. After spending time with close family and friends, many clients may be considering how best to plan for their future or whether any changes are needed to existing arrangements.

Recent cases in the Court of Protection illustrate the problems that all too often arise where

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll