header-logo header-logo

20 February 2026 / Ann Stanyer
Issue: 8150 / Categories: Features , Court of Protection , Profession , Mental health , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Is your LPA gathering dust?

242969
Lasting powers of attorney & letters of wishes should evolve with a client’s life. Regular reviews can prevent family disputes, court intervention & costly mistakes, writes Ann Stanyer
  • Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) should be reviewed at least every five years—and after any major life event—to ensure attorneys remain appropriate and arrangements still reflect the client’s wishes.
  • Thoughtful selection of attorneys, clear restrictions within the LPA, and a well-drafted letter of wishes can prevent misunderstandings, misuse of powers and costly Court of Protection disputes.
  • Proactive conversations about care, finances and decision-making reduce the risk of family conflict and court intervention if capacity is lost.

As 2026 gets underway, now is the time to review important documents, including powers of attorney. After spending time with close family and friends, many clients may be considering how best to plan for their future or whether any changes are needed to existing arrangements.

Recent cases in the Court of Protection illustrate the problems that all too often arise where

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll