header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
23 March 2007 / Navdeep Gill
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

IT confidential

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

When are public authority contracts likely to be liable for full disclosure, asks Navdeep Gill

In a recent landmark decision, Derry County Council v Information Commissioner EA/2006/0014, the Information Tribunal (IT) dismissed a claim by Derry County Council (the council) that it was exempt from releasing financial information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FIA 2000).

The council sought to rely on three exemptions in FIA 2000:

  • section 29, prejudice to the economic interests of the UK or any part of the UK;
  • section 41, information provided in confidence; and 
  • section 43, prejudice to the commercial interests of any person including the public authority.

The IT’s decision on s 41 is the most significant and will come as a blow to many in the private sector who may have previously thought that FIA 2000 would not be of concern to them. In its decision the IT took the bold view that information contained in a concluded contract with a public authority can fall outside the scope of the s 41 exemption since

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll