header-logo header-logo

23 March 2007 / Navdeep Gill
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

IT confidential

When are public authority contracts likely to be liable for full disclosure, asks Navdeep Gill

In a recent landmark decision, Derry County Council v Information Commissioner EA/2006/0014, the Information Tribunal (IT) dismissed a claim by Derry County Council (the council) that it was exempt from releasing financial information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FIA 2000).

The council sought to rely on three exemptions in FIA 2000:

  • section 29, prejudice to the economic interests of the UK or any part of the UK;
  • section 41, information provided in confidence; and 
  • section 43, prejudice to the commercial interests of any person including the public authority.

The IT’s decision on s 41 is the most significant and will come as a blow to many in the private sector who may have previously thought that FIA 2000 would not be of concern to them. In its decision the IT took the bold view that information contained in a concluded contract with a public authority can fall outside the scope of the s 41 exemption since

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll