header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
23 March 2007 / Navdeep Gill
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

IT confidential

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

When are public authority contracts likely to be liable for full disclosure, asks Navdeep Gill

In a recent landmark decision, Derry County Council v Information Commissioner EA/2006/0014, the Information Tribunal (IT) dismissed a claim by Derry County Council (the council) that it was exempt from releasing financial information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FIA 2000).

The council sought to rely on three exemptions in FIA 2000:

  • section 29, prejudice to the economic interests of the UK or any part of the UK;
  • section 41, information provided in confidence; and 
  • section 43, prejudice to the commercial interests of any person including the public authority.

The IT’s decision on s 41 is the most significant and will come as a blow to many in the private sector who may have previously thought that FIA 2000 would not be of concern to them. In its decision the IT took the bold view that information contained in a concluded contract with a public authority can fall outside the scope of the s 41 exemption since

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll