header-logo header-logo

16 October 2015 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7672 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

In it together?

Alec Samuels examines the ins & outs of hot-tubbing

“Hot-tubbing” is the idiomatic or picturesque phrase for experts giving their evidence concurrently, ie both together in the witness box. The practice is still very uncommon in England, very rare in medical cases, but beginning to be used in engineering and construction disputes in arbitration and in the Technical and Construction Court, and even in the Family Court.

Procedure

There are so far no specific rules governing the procedure. Clearly the factual basis of the case needs to be set out first. Each side could call their principal lay witness, to be examined, cross-examined and re-examined. Or, more in accordance with modern practice, the written statements could be put in, so as in effect to set the scene. The respective experts would then be taken together.

The judge will question the experts, taking topic by topic, putting the same question to each expert in turn. At the end of the questioning on each topic the judge will invite the respective advocates to further question the experts, a sort

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll