header-logo header-logo

14 May 2009 / Romola Parish
Issue: 7369 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public , Community care
printer mail-detail

It's a jungle out there

The Community Infrastructure Levy & other animals, by Romola Parish

* * * * * *

A recurrent theme in planning law is the thorny issue of how best to “tax” development. This is highly topical at present when planning contributions are estimated to have fallen from £9bn last year to £3bn this year, and are expected to fall further. The Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL), enacted by the Planning Act 2008 (PA 2008), is the latest in a long history of short-lived “development taxes”, “planning gain supplements”, and similar mechanisms that extend the reach of the existing s 106 agreements.

The CIL is one of the most controversial aspects of PA 2008 because of the way in which it restructures the basis of planning contributions to raise funds for specific regional infrastructure projects. Infrastructure is defined in PA 2008 to include roads, flood defences, educational, medical and sporting facilities, open space and housing.

As originally drafted, the rate of CIL was to be based on the increase in land value

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll