header-logo header-logo

14 May 2009 / Romola Parish
Issue: 7369 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public , Community care
printer mail-detail

It's a jungle out there

The Community Infrastructure Levy & other animals, by Romola Parish

* * * * * *

A recurrent theme in planning law is the thorny issue of how best to “tax” development. This is highly topical at present when planning contributions are estimated to have fallen from £9bn last year to £3bn this year, and are expected to fall further. The Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL), enacted by the Planning Act 2008 (PA 2008), is the latest in a long history of short-lived “development taxes”, “planning gain supplements”, and similar mechanisms that extend the reach of the existing s 106 agreements.

The CIL is one of the most controversial aspects of PA 2008 because of the way in which it restructures the basis of planning contributions to raise funds for specific regional infrastructure projects. Infrastructure is defined in PA 2008 to include roads, flood defences, educational, medical and sporting facilities, open space and housing.

As originally drafted, the rate of CIL was to be based on the increase in land value

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll