header-logo header-logo

Jackson delayed to 2013

02 February 2012
Issue: 7499 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Update on timetable for Legal Aid, Sentencing & Punishment of Offenders Bill

Lord Wallace, the Advocate General for Scotland, has confirmed that, subject to Parliamentary approval, the implementation of the Jackson reforms will be postponed until April 2013. They were originally due to come into effect in October this year.

In a statement in the House of Lords on the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill this week, Lord Wallace said: “These proposals will require the making of new regulations and changes to the Civil Procedure Rules.

“We wish to make sure that we get the details of these regulations and rules right, and that will inevitably take some time. We are also conscious that stakeholders will need appropriate notice of when the changes will be implemented and how the details will affect them.”

The Jackson reforms would impose a 25% cap on uplift fees, add an extra 10% onto damages, and put an end to lawyers being able to recover success fees and after-the-event premiums from losing defendants.

The legal aid provisions of the Bill have already been postponed to April 2013.

A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: “We are committed to reforming the ‘no-win, no-fee’ system so that legal costs for reasonable compensation claims will be more proportionate, and avoidable claims will be deterred from going to court.

“This will help us to move away from the current unacceptable situation where, for example, the NHS paid £200m to claimants’ lawyers for compensation cases in 2010-11—around three times more than it paid its own lawyers.

“This will require changes to legal rules and regulations and we want to give sufficient time to get the complex details right. We are also conscious that legal businesses will need sufficient time to plan for the changes, alongside other forthcoming regulatory and funding changes to the industry.” 

The delay has been welcomed by legal commentators. NLJ columnist, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School, says: "The postponement is welcome. It is essential, given the enormity of the reforms, that measures are thoroughly prepared. The current Part 36 mess is due to implementation with undue haste in 2007."

Issue: 7499 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll