header-logo header-logo

Jackson favours the costs lawyer?

24 June 2014
Issue: 7612 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Costs lawyers have emerged as one of the winners in the Jackson shake-up of civil litigation.

They are in greater demand than ever before as the Jackson reforms and the Mitchell case have boosted the significance of budgeting, according to the Association of Costs Lawyers’ (ACL) annual survey of its members.

Nearly six in 10 respondents to the survey (59%) have expanded their practices as a result of the reforms, with half taking on new staff as a result.

Nearly three-quarters of the 102 respondents (72%) said the demand for costs budgeting had increased “significantly" in the past year, with 52% expecting more of the same over the next 12 months. 

Asked how the budgeting regime was working, two-thirds said it had brought costs lawyers’ skills to the fore. Some 45% replied that it depended which judge they were before, while 43% found that solicitors remain in denial or unaware of the demands.

In response to the reforms, costs lawyers are focusing on multi-track cases over the fast-track. Some 40% of costs lawyers have diversified into other areas, while one fifth are looking for mergers or acquisitions.

In 2013, 71% of costs lawyers predicted that the Jackson reforms would discourage solicitors from taking on less straightforward cases, and this year some 30% said it had actually happened. Nearly half of respondents expected the reforms to discourage claimants, but the 2014 poll found that only 18% and 23% of costs lawyers respectively said they had had that effect.

Sue Nash, ACL chair, says: “While the results show that the Jackson reforms have not damaged civil litigants’ access to justice as much as had been feared, they also emphasise that there is no room for complacency. It is clear that some claimants are being turned away from seeking justice, and it is the responsibility of all of us to ensure that the system adapts to ensure that all of those with a valid claim have the support to bring it.”

 

Issue: 7612 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll