header-logo header-logo

Jackson’s birthday blues

01 April 2014 / James Arrowsmith
Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

The profession must use the Jackson reforms as a platform for change, says James Arrowsmith

Thompsons Solicitors say it has created a “climate of fear”, the City of London Law Society describes it as “punitive and formalistic—even anachronistic”. The change in costs and case management introduced by Lord Justice Jackson has certainly caught the attention of the profession.

Practical impact

Two cases provide striking examples of the impact the reforms can have on individual claims:

  • Mitchell v News Group Newspapers Limited [2013] EWCA Civ 1537 is now synonymous with tough costs management, having had his recoverable costs (which might otherwise have been in the region of £500,000) limited to court fees, for failing to file a budget.
  • Newland Shipping & Forwarding Ltd v Toba Trading FZC [2014] EWHC 210 (Comm) saw two defendants subject to a combined judgment of $7m for failing to provide proper disclosure or serve witness statements on time, and fail in their application for relief from sanctions.

However, it is easy to focus on the outcomes of cases without considering the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll