header-logo header-logo

04 October 2018 / Steve Hynes
Issue: 7811 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Jam tomorrow or just promises?

Steve Hynes welcomes the Labour party’s commitment to widening access to justice & hopes the government will track back from LASPO

At a fringe meeting on access to justice at the Labour party conference in Liverpool last week Labour’s shadow Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary Richard Burgon, was making bold statements about restoring civil legal aid and increasing the number of Law Centres. He told the meeting held on 24 September: ‘After ten years of austerity access to justice is more important than ever.’ Perhaps not surprisingly his comments went down well with a large audience of lawyers and activists.

Lord Willy Bach also spoke at the event. He told the meeting that just before he left office as legal aid minister in April 2010 the number of cases supported by legal aid peaked before beginning to fall away under the coalition government. They fell off a cliff he said with the introduction of LASPO (The Legal Aid and Sentencing of Offenders Act 2012). According to Bach: ‘Of all the objectional legislation passed under

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll