header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
04 October 2018 / Steve Hynes
Issue: 7811 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Jam tomorrow or just promises?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Steve Hynes welcomes the Labour party’s commitment to widening access to justice & hopes the government will track back from LASPO

At a fringe meeting on access to justice at the Labour party conference in Liverpool last week Labour’s shadow Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary Richard Burgon, was making bold statements about restoring civil legal aid and increasing the number of Law Centres. He told the meeting held on 24 September: ‘After ten years of austerity access to justice is more important than ever.’ Perhaps not surprisingly his comments went down well with a large audience of lawyers and activists.

Lord Willy Bach also spoke at the event. He told the meeting that just before he left office as legal aid minister in April 2010 the number of cases supported by legal aid peaked before beginning to fall away under the coalition government. They fell off a cliff he said with the introduction of LASPO (The Legal Aid and Sentencing of Offenders Act 2012). According to Bach: ‘Of all the objectional legislation passed under

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll