header-logo header-logo

Joint expert—no fee

04 June 2010
Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

A jointly instructed sole expert’s fees are to be paid equally by each of the parties under a court order.

A jointly instructed sole expert’s fees are to be paid equally by each of the parties under a court order. Where neither party pays anything, does the court have the power to impose a sanction at the request of the expert or must the expert sue in contract?

The court could properly impose an appropriate stay until the expert’s fee had been paid in the exercise of its case management powers. However, this might raise difficulties as there could be some dispute between the parties or one of them and the expert as to, for example,  the amount of the expert’s charges or the standard of the expert’s service. It would be unfortunate if the court became involved in satellite litigation between the parties and the expert. The better course would be for the expert to make his independent claim in contract against the parties who instructed him and to seek an interim injunction forbidding the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll