header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
27 March 2015 / James Ward
Issue: 7646 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Is the joke on testators?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
ward_0

James Ward takes issue with the chancellor’s unjustified attack on deeds of variation

George Osborne’s latest budget was short on any concrete policies dealing with wills, estate administration and succession taxation. However, we were not expecting any substantial changes. We had already been told that the settlement nil-rate band was not going to be pursued by HM Revenue & Customs. We also knew that no increase in the current nil-rate band was likely, as this was a coalition budget and the Liberal Democrats would not have allowed it.

What to expect

We did, however, get a “leaked” insight as to what to expect from the Conservatives in relation to inheritance tax and the nil-rate band, if they win the next election. That is a slight improvement on the current nil-rate band, which was heavily caveated to make better headlines, rather than being a meaningful change in reality. This proposal has already brought much confusion for clients and could lead to an unnatural willingness not to sell the family home at any point,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll