header-logo header-logo

Judge meets the child

23 June 2017
Issue: 7751 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Q What is the current judicial policy concerning the judge on a Children Act 1989 application seeing the child in person? If that happens, to what extent is the judge compelled to report to the parties on the outcome of the meeting and should the child be told that there is to be full disclosure, if that is to happen?

A The courts follow the detailed Guidelines for Judges Meeting Children issued by the Family Justice Council in 2010. Whether to meet the child is in the discretion of the judge having regard to the purpose of the meeting, the stage of the proceedings and the arrangements which can be made, though where a child expresses a wish to see the judge (particularly in a public law case) then the judge would ordinarily agree. The purpose is not to obtain evidence but to enable the child to gain an understanding of what is going on and to be reassured that they have been understood by the judge. Any meeting should be in the presence

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll