header-logo header-logo

Judges face costs dilemma

17 May 2013
Issue: 7560 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Bench criticised for being patchy and inconsistent

Judges need more training to cope with their new costs management duties under the Jackson reforms, an 18-month pilot study indicates.

From 1 April, all represented parties must propose and exchange costs budgets ahead of litigation, and judges must approve and enforce the budget unless there is good reason to depart from it. The reforms have been piloted in technology and construction courts and mercantile courts since October 2011.

“Some solicitors (and judges) regard it as a substantial problem that barristers in the past had little involvement with costs issues; and that most judges were barristers before being appointed as judge,” the costs management pilot final report said.

It reported that one judge with 16 years’ experience on the bench complained that he felt “under-equipped” for detailed costs management. Solicitors complained that judges were often “patchy and inconsistent” in their approach.

High Court and district court judges have been given one day’s training on costs management at Judicial College seminars held around the country.

A costs lawyer with 40 years’ experience told the pilot’s monitoring team that his major concern was “a woeful lack of training for the judges”.

Professor Dominic Regan, who assisted Lord Justice Jackson with the reforms, said: “Since budgeting was a centrepiece of the Jackson reforms it is essential that judges feel competent and comfortable with the process.”

Issue: 7560 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll