header-logo header-logo

15 January 2009 / Janna Purdie
Issue: 7352 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Judgment debts

Janna Purdie considers courts’ powers to order judgment debts to be paid by instalments

Key Points

Generally judgment debts must be paid within 14 days of the date of the judgment and interim instalments may be ordered by the court if there is a realistic prospect of payments being achieved through the use of interim payments.

In the current economic climate it is increasingly likely that losing parties in litigation will be unable to afford to pay the whole of the judgment debt within the time frame provided for by the CPR. The question that practitioners may well need to be in a position to answer is whether they can apply to the court for an order that the judgment debt can be paid in instalments. This issue was considered recently by Mr Justice Akenhead in Amsalem.

Facts of the case

Akenhead J gave judgment for the claimant together with interests and costs. An interim payment of costs on account was ordered. The defendants therefore, under the provisions of CPR 40.11, had to pay

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll