header-logo header-logo

Judgment debts

15 January 2009 / Janna Purdie
Issue: 7352 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Janna Purdie considers courts’ powers to order judgment debts to be paid by instalments

Key Points

Generally judgment debts must be paid within 14 days of the date of the judgment and interim instalments may be ordered by the court if there is a realistic prospect of payments being achieved through the use of interim payments.

In the current economic climate it is increasingly likely that losing parties in litigation will be unable to afford to pay the whole of the judgment debt within the time frame provided for by the CPR. The question that practitioners may well need to be in a position to answer is whether they can apply to the court for an order that the judgment debt can be paid in instalments. This issue was considered recently by Mr Justice Akenhead in Amsalem.

Facts of the case

Akenhead J gave judgment for the claimant together with interests and costs. An interim payment of costs on account was ordered. The defendants therefore, under the provisions of CPR 40.11, had to pay

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll