header-logo header-logo

Judgment—Default judgment—Setting aside judgment

14 March 2014
Issue: 7598 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Samara v MBI & Partners UK Ltd and others [2014] EWHC 563 (QB), [2014] All ER (D) 48 (Mar)

Queen’s Bench Division, Silber J, 4 Mar 2014

The new regime that has implemented the Jackson proposals and altered the CPR applies to all the CPR, including applications to set aside default judgments under CPR Pt 13.

Sam Neaman (instructed by Ferguson Solicitors LLP) for the claimant. Derrick Dale QC and Rebecca Loveridge (instructed by Trowers & Hamlin LLP) for the first defendant. The second defendant did not appear and was not represented.

In March 2011, the claimant issued proceedings against the first defendant, claiming sums due to him under an employment contract. Neither an acknowledgement of service nor a defence was filed within the time limits prescribed by the CPR or at all. In September 2011, the master gave permission to enter judgment against the first defendant in default, which was entered in February 2012. The first defendant applied to set aside the default judgment under CPR 13.3. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll