header-logo header-logo

Judgment—Reserved judgment—Delay

05 May 2011
Issue: 7464 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Bond v Dunster Properties Ltd and others [2011] EWCA Civ 455, [2011] All ER (D) 248 (Apr)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lord Neuberger MR, Arden and Longmore LJJ, 21 Apr 2011

Delay in handing down judgment will not automatically render the judgment unsafe, but may affect whether the appeal court is prepared to interfere with findings of fact.

Richard Ascroft (instructed by Thrings LLP) for the claimant, Michelle Stevens-Hoare (instructed by Andrew Simpson) for the defendants.

The claimant was the father of the third defendant. The first two defendants were companies which the third defendant had established. The claim related to advances of £520,000 from the claimant to the companies between December 2002 and July 2003. The third defendant gave post-dated cheques as security. The claimant took possession of the property in August 2003. He issued proceedings in June 2005. The third defendant argued that the sums were made pursuant to an oral agreement between himself and the claimant to participate in a joint venture to acquire and develop a property. The monies were to be repaid out

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll