header-logo header-logo

Judgment—Reserved judgment—Delay

05 May 2011
Issue: 7464 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Bond v Dunster Properties Ltd and others [2011] EWCA Civ 455, [2011] All ER (D) 248 (Apr)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lord Neuberger MR, Arden and Longmore LJJ, 21 Apr 2011

Delay in handing down judgment will not automatically render the judgment unsafe, but may affect whether the appeal court is prepared to interfere with findings of fact.

Richard Ascroft (instructed by Thrings LLP) for the claimant, Michelle Stevens-Hoare (instructed by Andrew Simpson) for the defendants.

The claimant was the father of the third defendant. The first two defendants were companies which the third defendant had established. The claim related to advances of £520,000 from the claimant to the companies between December 2002 and July 2003. The third defendant gave post-dated cheques as security. The claimant took possession of the property in August 2003. He issued proceedings in June 2005. The third defendant argued that the sums were made pursuant to an oral agreement between himself and the claimant to participate in a joint venture to acquire and develop a property. The monies were to be repaid out

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—Michael Conway

Birketts—Michael Conway

IP partner joins team in Bristol to lead branding and trade marks practice

Blake Morgan—Daniel Church

Blake Morgan—Daniel Church

Succession and tax team welcomes partner inLondon

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec

Firm appoints senior associate to lead Manchester city centre team

NEWS
Ministers’ proposals to raise funds by seizing interest on lawyers’ client account schemes could ‘cause firms to close’, solicitors have warned
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
back-to-top-scroll