header-logo header-logo

Judgment—Reserved judgment—Delay

05 May 2011
Issue: 7464 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Bond v Dunster Properties Ltd and others [2011] EWCA Civ 455, [2011] All ER (D) 248 (Apr)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lord Neuberger MR, Arden and Longmore LJJ, 21 Apr 2011

Delay in handing down judgment will not automatically render the judgment unsafe, but may affect whether the appeal court is prepared to interfere with findings of fact.

Richard Ascroft (instructed by Thrings LLP) for the claimant, Michelle Stevens-Hoare (instructed by Andrew Simpson) for the defendants.

The claimant was the father of the third defendant. The first two defendants were companies which the third defendant had established. The claim related to advances of £520,000 from the claimant to the companies between December 2002 and July 2003. The third defendant gave post-dated cheques as security. The claimant took possession of the property in August 2003. He issued proceedings in June 2005. The third defendant argued that the sums were made pursuant to an oral agreement between himself and the claimant to participate in a joint venture to acquire and develop a property. The monies were to be repaid out

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Solicitors are installing panic buttons and thumb print scanners due to ‘systemic and rising’ intimidation including death and arson threats from clients
Ministers’ decision to scrap plans for their Labour manifesto pledge of day one protection from unfair dismissal was entirely predictable, employment lawyers have said
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll