header-logo header-logo

Judgments without particulars of claim

09 September 2016
Issue: 7713 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

A claimant who has commenced a money claim on line may subsequently serve the particulars of claim but CPR PD 7E.11 requires the filing of a certificate of service of those particulars in form B215 within 14 days of service being effected. Why do the CPR or PD 7E not provide for the particulars of claim to be filed before judgment can be entered?

If the online claim form provided perfectly adequate and compliant particulars but went on to say that detailed particulars were to follow, would the defendant still be entitled to refrain from filing a defence until after those detailed particulars had been served? There is a case for the claimant to be required to file the particulars as well as the certificate so as to reduce the risk of a default judgment being entered when the particulars have not, in fact, been served. As things presently stand, it is possible for the claimant to state on the claim form that the particulars will follow and then proceed to procure

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll