header-logo header-logo

Revalue of claim

08 February 2008
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

If the court serves a claim form by post in disregard for the request of the claimant’s solicitors that...

If the court serves a claim form by post in disregard for the request of the claimant’s solicitors that the form should be sent to them to effect personal service when they are ready, is the court empowered to set the postal service aside?


There is no authority on whether service in this situation is bad. It may be good. The appropriate course—and the one normally adopted when the situation does arise—is for the time to be extended for filing and service of the particulars of claim (if not already served). In a personal injury claim there can be an extension for any medical report to be relied on and the schedule of loss. The duration of the extension may be the period sought by the claimant’s solicitors up to a maximum of four months from issue. If the particulars of claim have been served, the time for service of the defence can be suitably extended

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll