header-logo header-logo

29 November 2007
Issue: 7299 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Judicial line: 30 November 2007

This week: Affidavit formalities; ancillary relief conduct; waiting place for witnesses; bankruptcy for unliquidated claims; small claim expenses.

AFFIDAVITS: SOURCE OF INFORMATION AND BELIEF

In In re J L Young Manufacturing Company Limited [1900] 2 Ch 753, the Court of Appeal held that an affidavit of evidence given on information and belief without indicating the source, was inadmissible as evidence whether on an interlocutory or final application. CPR 32PD4.2 (2) still requires an affidavit to indicate the source of any matters of information and belief and 18.2(2) provides the same in relation to witness statements. Is Re J L Young still good law or has something in the CPR or the civil evidence legislation eroded its effect?

We regard Re J L Young as still good law although more honoured in the breach than the observance. The requirement has been carried through into CPR PD32 and in respect of both affidavits and witness statements. An objection to an affidavit on the ground that there has been non-compliance with this requirement is a perfectly proper one.

SILENCING

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

From mowing lawns to life at the Bar: Stephen Ward reflects on an unconventional career

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Commercial property partner joins Clarke Willmott in Southampton

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Robert Tiffen joins Ellisons as Partner in growing Norwich office

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll