header-logo header-logo

Claim form postal service delivery

13 September 2008
Issue: 7288 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

What does it take to displace the service deeming provisions of the CPR...

What does it take to displace the service deeming provisions of the Criminal Procedure Rules (CPR)—the current postal disarray? Surely the time has come for the court to say that the continued application of these provisions is a violence to common sense.

It would take an amendment of the CPR or a decision of the Court of Appeal! However, the latter is unlikely. In a slightly different context, the point did trouble the Court of Appeal in Barnes v St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council [2006] EWCA (Civ) 1372, [2006] All ER (D) 303 (Oct) but the principle is that the occasional deeming of service, when the reality is that the claim form was delayed or lost in the post, is the price to be paid for having a regime that provides certainty as to the service date to be taken.

If the court was satisfied that service had not been effected on the deemed date or at all and that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll