header-logo header-logo

Enforcing charging order

03 June 2010
Issue: 7420 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Mortgagees are increasingly reluctant to disclose the balance outstanding to them when...

Mortgagees are increasingly reluctant to disclose the balance outstanding to them when asked to do so by a judgment creditor who is seeking an order for sale following a final charging order. What is the most efficient means of procuring this information (which should be supplied in the supporting evidence)?

The combined effect of CPR PD73 paras 4.3(4) and 4.4 is that the claimant must have taken all reasonable steps to find out the amount owed to each creditor. If the debtor declines to provide the claimant with an appropriate authority and the creditor will not cooperate then the claimant has discharged his responsibility. Of course, the claimant may wish to ascertain the amount of indebtedness to prior chargees before deciding how far down the order for sale road it is commercially viable to go. In that event, the claimant might make a third party disclosure application before or in the course of order for sale proceedings. An alternative and more robust approach

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll