header-logo header-logo

03 June 2010
Issue: 7420 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Enforcing charging order

Mortgagees are increasingly reluctant to disclose the balance outstanding to them when...

Mortgagees are increasingly reluctant to disclose the balance outstanding to them when asked to do so by a judgment creditor who is seeking an order for sale following a final charging order. What is the most efficient means of procuring this information (which should be supplied in the supporting evidence)?

The combined effect of CPR PD73 paras 4.3(4) and 4.4 is that the claimant must have taken all reasonable steps to find out the amount owed to each creditor. If the debtor declines to provide the claimant with an appropriate authority and the creditor will not cooperate then the claimant has discharged his responsibility. Of course, the claimant may wish to ascertain the amount of indebtedness to prior chargees before deciding how far down the order for sale road it is commercially viable to go. In that event, the claimant might make a third party disclosure application before or in the course of order for sale proceedings. An alternative and more robust approach

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll