header-logo header-logo

30 June 2011
Issue: 7472 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Judicial review—Availability of remedy—Upper Tribunal

R (on the application of Cart) v Upper Tribunal; R (on the application of MR (Pakistan)) v Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) and another [2011] UKSC 28, [2011] All ER (D) 149 (Jun)

Supreme Court, Lord Phillips P, Lord Hope DP, Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Clarke and Lord Dyson, 22 Jun 2011

Judicial review by the High Court of a refusal by the Upper Tribunal of permission to appeal to itself is available, but it is confined to the application of the second-tier appeals criteria, namely where: (i) the proposed appeal raises some important point of principle or practice; or (ii) there is some other compelling reason.

Richard Drabble QC and Charles Banner (instructed by Bates Wells & Braithwaite LLP) for Cart. Manjit Gill QC, Natsai Manyarara and Jay Patel (instructed by Archer Fields Solicitors) for MR. The respondent tribunals did not appear and were not represented. James Eadie QC and Samuel Grodzinski (instructed by DWP/DH Legal Services and the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretaries

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

NEWS
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
Lawyers have been asked for their views on proposals to change the penalties for assaulting a police officer
back-to-top-scroll