header-logo header-logo

Judicial selection & the will of the people

16 June 2017 / Charles Auld , Kate Harrington
Issue: 7750 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Charles Auld & Dr Kate Harrington reflect on what can be done to maintain confidence in judicial decisions

‘Enemies of the people’ screamed the tabloid press in the wake of the High Court’s Brexit ruling on Art 50. Such was the apparent public venom against those judges that at one stage it seemed that Lord Thomas, the Lord Chief Justice, might be wise to follow the example of the previous Welsh Lord Chief Justice, Lord Jeffreys. After the Glorious Revolution of 1689, ‘Hanging Judge Jeffreys’ as he is better known took refuge in the Tower of London to avoid the wrath of the mob. He was more fortunate than his predecessor, Sir John Cavendish, who was murdered by the mob during the Peasants’ Revolt of 1381 and his head stuck on a pike. So denigrating the judiciary is not a new pastime, but as the President of the Supreme Court Lord Neuberger made clear, vitriolic attacks by the Press undermine the rule of law and politicians could have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll