header-logo header-logo

08 February 2007 / Stuart Pemble
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Just hot air?

Do the government’s plans for carbon-neutral homes stack up? asks Stuart Pemble

In his Pre-Budget Report, Investing in Britain’s Potential: Building Our Long-Term Future (Cm 6984), on 6 December 2006, the Chancellor Gordon Brown announced a brave new green world: all new homes are to be carbon neutral by 2010. However, by the time Ruth Kelly, Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, launched the government’s consultation on the process—Building a Greener Future: Towards Zero Carbon Development—a week later, the timetable had already slipped to 2016. Everyone appears to agree on the need for change: in 2004, energy use in UK homes was responsible for a quarter of all of our carbon emissions. But what can be done in practice?

Regulation, regulation…

The most obvious change is that the Building Regulations 2000 (SI 2000/2531) (the regulations), the regime of statutory instruments which underpin the Building Act 1984, need to be changed. Once the government has decided on what constitutes a carbon-neutral home, any home constructed will have to comply with the regulations. Failure to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
Britain’s new acknowledgement that Israel’s occupation is unlawful, and accompanying settlement-goods ban and sanctions, is significant but overdue, argue Danny Friedman KC and Victor Kattan in NLJ this week
New planning fee rises, wider trade union access rights and a service-by-email trap feature in Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
back-to-top-scroll