header-logo header-logo

Just hot air?

08 February 2007 / Stuart Pemble
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Do the government’s plans for carbon-neutral homes stack up? asks Stuart Pemble

In his Pre-Budget Report, Investing in Britain’s Potential: Building Our Long-Term Future (Cm 6984), on 6 December 2006, the Chancellor Gordon Brown announced a brave new green world: all new homes are to be carbon neutral by 2010. However, by the time Ruth Kelly, Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, launched the government’s consultation on the process—Building a Greener Future: Towards Zero Carbon Development—a week later, the timetable had already slipped to 2016. Everyone appears to agree on the need for change: in 2004, energy use in UK homes was responsible for a quarter of all of our carbon emissions. But what can be done in practice?

Regulation, regulation…

The most obvious change is that the Building Regulations 2000 (SI 2000/2531) (the regulations), the regime of statutory instruments which underpin the Building Act 1984, need to be changed. Once the government has decided on what constitutes a carbon-neutral home, any home constructed will have to comply with the regulations. Failure to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll