header-logo header-logo

15 March 2012
Issue: 7505 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Justice calls for clarity

Senior judge calls for “quick win” for family justice reform

Simplified, “plain language” steps for the appointment of expert witnesses in family cases should be introduced, the senior judge in charge of reviewing family justice has said.

Mr Justice Ryder identified this as a “quick win”—one of “those changes which we all agree should be made without delay and where changes in legislation may not be necessary”.

“I am working closely with government lawyers and the Family Procedure Rule Committee to identify rules and/or practice direction changes to give more clarity about when it is appropriate to appoint an expert and to ensure that the work commissioned from experts is necessary and relevant to the issues to be decided by the court,” he says, in his third update on his Family Justice Modernisation Programme.

Ryder J says there will be greater continuity of case management by judges and case managers under new docketing guidance agreed with the Judicial Executive Board. There is already an expectation that judges and legal advisers should not be away from their court for more than a month at a time, he says.

The judge reports that the National Family Justice Board is due to launch next month, and discussion is ongoing over the contributions required of judges to local boards.

A national pilot on data reporting for judges will also begin next month. Leadership judges will be given “reliable data from court hearings and about the volume and type of work that takes place in the family courts”, allowing them “to improve performance and to contribute to effective business plans for the best use of our resources”. 

Ryder J says he expects the government to create a statutory family court within the next year, and agreement has been reached over the division of work between the High Court and the family court.

He is due to announce his recommendations for reform by 31 July 2012, having first agreed them with the Family Procedure Rule Committee, the Family Justice Council, leadership judges, the Judicial Executive Board and the HMCTS board.

Issue: 7505 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll