header-logo header-logo

Justice calls for clarity

15 March 2012
Issue: 7505 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Senior judge calls for “quick win” for family justice reform

Simplified, “plain language” steps for the appointment of expert witnesses in family cases should be introduced, the senior judge in charge of reviewing family justice has said.

Mr Justice Ryder identified this as a “quick win”—one of “those changes which we all agree should be made without delay and where changes in legislation may not be necessary”.

“I am working closely with government lawyers and the Family Procedure Rule Committee to identify rules and/or practice direction changes to give more clarity about when it is appropriate to appoint an expert and to ensure that the work commissioned from experts is necessary and relevant to the issues to be decided by the court,” he says, in his third update on his Family Justice Modernisation Programme.

Ryder J says there will be greater continuity of case management by judges and case managers under new docketing guidance agreed with the Judicial Executive Board. There is already an expectation that judges and legal advisers should not be away from their court for more than a month at a time, he says.

The judge reports that the National Family Justice Board is due to launch next month, and discussion is ongoing over the contributions required of judges to local boards.

A national pilot on data reporting for judges will also begin next month. Leadership judges will be given “reliable data from court hearings and about the volume and type of work that takes place in the family courts”, allowing them “to improve performance and to contribute to effective business plans for the best use of our resources”. 

Ryder J says he expects the government to create a statutory family court within the next year, and agreement has been reached over the division of work between the High Court and the family court.

He is due to announce his recommendations for reform by 31 July 2012, having first agreed them with the Family Procedure Rule Committee, the Family Justice Council, leadership judges, the Judicial Executive Board and the HMCTS board.

Issue: 7505 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll