header-logo header-logo

04 February 2011 / Juliet Carp
Issue: 7451 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Justice for fathers?

Juliet Carp welcomes a new addition to the family—transferable maternity leave

Politicians have been talking for a long time about letting families decide how fathers and mothers should split leave after a baby is born. The Additional Paternity Leave Regulations 2010 (SI 2010/1055) are finally due to come into force for families whose babies are due on or after 3 April 2011. This will allow up to 26 weeks’ “additional maternity leave” to be transferred to a baby’s father after the mother has returned to work. (Similar arrangements apply to same sex families and adopting families.)

Upside

The new legislation offers some positive benefits. Clearly, many fathers will have greater opportunity to spend time with their new babies (and older siblings) and, at a more practical level, this could give families where the mother earns more than the father a chance to make some financial savings. Many comment that, given typical disparities in earning power, most fathers will not take up the offer of additional paternity leave. However, that rather misses the point. Large

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll