header-logo header-logo

Justice for fathers?

04 February 2011 / Juliet Carp
Issue: 7451 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Juliet Carp welcomes a new addition to the family—transferable maternity leave

Politicians have been talking for a long time about letting families decide how fathers and mothers should split leave after a baby is born. The Additional Paternity Leave Regulations 2010 (SI 2010/1055) are finally due to come into force for families whose babies are due on or after 3 April 2011. This will allow up to 26 weeks’ “additional maternity leave” to be transferred to a baby’s father after the mother has returned to work. (Similar arrangements apply to same sex families and adopting families.)

Upside

The new legislation offers some positive benefits. Clearly, many fathers will have greater opportunity to spend time with their new babies (and older siblings) and, at a more practical level, this could give families where the mother earns more than the father a chance to make some financial savings. Many comment that, given typical disparities in earning power, most fathers will not take up the offer of additional paternity leave. However, that rather misses the point. Large

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll