header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
04 July 2019 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7847 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Justice in a time of austerity (Pt 5)

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Advice droughts are as damaging & deserve as much attention as advice deserts, says Jon Robins

As NLJ readers know all too well, vast swathes of England and Wales have been reduced to legal advice deserts. Earlier this year Chancery Lane warned that over half of all local authority areas had either one or no housing legal aid provider.

How helpful is it to talk of ‘advice deserts’? The phrase is misleading. It suggests that people lucky enough to live outside of advice deserts can find advice or representation. Obviously, that’s not true. Even if someone manages to find a living, breathing legal aid lawyer they have to be eligible and their legal problem has to fall within what remains of the post-LASPO legal aid scheme.

But that’s not the end of the story. Last month Dr Jo Wilding, a barrister based at Garden Court Chambers, published her research into the dysfunctional and failing ‘market’ of publicly-funded legal advice in immigration and asylum advice (‘Droughts and Deserts:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Tightening the screws on JCT terminations
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
NLJ this week: Old rules, fresh warnings in employment law
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
NLJ this week: The rise of the ‘ChatGPT client’ rattles the profession
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
NLJ this week: Surrogacy children caught in succession gap
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
NLJ this week: Online safety law at a crossroads
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll