header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
04 July 2019 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7847 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Justice in a time of austerity (Pt 5)

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Advice droughts are as damaging & deserve as much attention as advice deserts, says Jon Robins

As NLJ readers know all too well, vast swathes of England and Wales have been reduced to legal advice deserts. Earlier this year Chancery Lane warned that over half of all local authority areas had either one or no housing legal aid provider.

How helpful is it to talk of ‘advice deserts’? The phrase is misleading. It suggests that people lucky enough to live outside of advice deserts can find advice or representation. Obviously, that’s not true. Even if someone manages to find a living, breathing legal aid lawyer they have to be eligible and their legal problem has to fall within what remains of the post-LASPO legal aid scheme.

But that’s not the end of the story. Last month Dr Jo Wilding, a barrister based at Garden Court Chambers, published her research into the dysfunctional and failing ‘market’ of publicly-funded legal advice in immigration and asylum advice (‘Droughts and Deserts:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026—the winners!
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll