header-logo header-logo

04 July 2019 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7847 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Justice in a time of austerity (Pt 5)

Advice droughts are as damaging & deserve as much attention as advice deserts, says Jon Robins

As NLJ readers know all too well, vast swathes of England and Wales have been reduced to legal advice deserts. Earlier this year Chancery Lane warned that over half of all local authority areas had either one or no housing legal aid provider.

How helpful is it to talk of ‘advice deserts’? The phrase is misleading. It suggests that people lucky enough to live outside of advice deserts can find advice or representation. Obviously, that’s not true. Even if someone manages to find a living, breathing legal aid lawyer they have to be eligible and their legal problem has to fall within what remains of the post-LASPO legal aid scheme.

But that’s not the end of the story. Last month Dr Jo Wilding, a barrister based at Garden Court Chambers, published her research into the dysfunctional and failing ‘market’ of publicly-funded legal advice in immigration and asylum advice (‘Droughts and Deserts:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll