header-logo header-logo

13 February 2015 / Caterina Yandell
Issue: 7640 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Keeping afloat

yandell

As post financial crisis claims against valuers decline Caterina Yandell forecasts the next wave of cases

In the run up to the general election, property pundits are attempting to predict the effects of the uncertainty on the market. No doubt they are also concerned by events elsewhere in Russia and Europe, in general. What no one wants is a return to 2008—the effects of which are still even now being felt in the valuation industry. During the course of 2007 there had been a huge growth in lending against development sites. By 2008 many of these sites had suffered substantial reductions in value—leaving the loans secured against them “underwater”. This in turn produced a surge in claims against valuers. Although the last of these are now working their way through the courts, the profession and its insurers are still reeling. Last year produced a rash of cases where the courts provided some balance on the division of responsibility between bank and valuer. However, to some at least it appears that the courts approach remains weighted

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll