header-logo header-logo

24 June 2010 / Dr Nicholas Roberts
Issue: 7423 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Keeping warm communally

Dr Nicholas Roberts explains why long-term flat leaseholders can face an insulation brick wall

Governments of all political persuasions are keen to encourage home energy conservation as part of the campaign to drive down CO2 emissions, but little attention has been paid to how difficult this may be for those who live in long leasehold flats. In many cases, however much as they may wish to insulate their homes, the legal matrix which they inhabit makes it difficult to improve the physical structure in which they live.

The typical scenario

The case considered here is that of the owner of the long leasehold flat which is of conventional construction, whether purpose-built or a “conversion”. It is assumed that the legal structure will be the usual “internal box” set-up, ie with the foundations, main structure, exterior and roof the responsibility of the ground landlord, and the leaseholder responsible only for internal repairs and decorations). The priorities for most house owners who wished to insulate their homes would probably be:
l additional loft insulation;
l double glazing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll