header-logo header-logo

Know your limits

30 June 2011 / Lesley Hughes , Rachael Reynolds
Issue: 7472 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Lesley Hughes & Rachael Reynolds report on restrictive covenants & the power of the lands tribunal

Restrictive covenants affecting development land are common. For a developer, they are obstacles to maximising value—but they are rarely viewed as insurmountable. Money is set aside to buy off those with the benefit of the covenant where known, to obtain indemnity insurance where not or, as a last resort, an application is made to the lands tribunal for the modification or release of the covenant to allow the development to proceed. While developers are generally aware that this third option is dogged by the delay and costs involved, they often assume that once the procedural hurdles have been overcome they will get the order they seek. Is it safe to make this assumption? The recent lands tribunal decision in George Wimpey Bristol Ltd and Gloucestershire Housing Association Ltd [2011] UKUT 91 (LC) provides a clear warning for developers.

The law

The power of the lands tribunal to modify or release restrictive covenants is set out

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll