header-logo header-logo

30 June 2011 / Lesley Hughes , Rachael Reynolds
Issue: 7472 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Know your limits

Lesley Hughes & Rachael Reynolds report on restrictive covenants & the power of the lands tribunal

Restrictive covenants affecting development land are common. For a developer, they are obstacles to maximising value—but they are rarely viewed as insurmountable. Money is set aside to buy off those with the benefit of the covenant where known, to obtain indemnity insurance where not or, as a last resort, an application is made to the lands tribunal for the modification or release of the covenant to allow the development to proceed. While developers are generally aware that this third option is dogged by the delay and costs involved, they often assume that once the procedural hurdles have been overcome they will get the order they seek. Is it safe to make this assumption? The recent lands tribunal decision in George Wimpey Bristol Ltd and Gloucestershire Housing Association Ltd [2011] UKUT 91 (LC) provides a clear warning for developers.

The law

The power of the lands tribunal to modify or release restrictive covenants is set out

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll