header-logo header-logo

30 June 2011 / Lesley Hughes , Rachael Reynolds
Issue: 7472 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Know your limits

Lesley Hughes & Rachael Reynolds report on restrictive covenants & the power of the lands tribunal

Restrictive covenants affecting development land are common. For a developer, they are obstacles to maximising value—but they are rarely viewed as insurmountable. Money is set aside to buy off those with the benefit of the covenant where known, to obtain indemnity insurance where not or, as a last resort, an application is made to the lands tribunal for the modification or release of the covenant to allow the development to proceed. While developers are generally aware that this third option is dogged by the delay and costs involved, they often assume that once the procedural hurdles have been overcome they will get the order they seek. Is it safe to make this assumption? The recent lands tribunal decision in George Wimpey Bristol Ltd and Gloucestershire Housing Association Ltd [2011] UKUT 91 (LC) provides a clear warning for developers.

The law

The power of the lands tribunal to modify or release restrictive covenants is set out

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft strengthens Scottish real estate capabilitywith partner appointment

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Brendan Ryan as partner in Public Law Projects team

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers welcomes five new barristers

NEWS
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
back-to-top-scroll