header-logo header-logo

13 August 2021 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7945 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Lack of trust at heart of legal aid failures

54930
Jon Robins on unfairness at the Legal Aid Agency & the shocking impact on clients

It’s a measure of the madness that lies at the heart of legal aid policy that among the many sensible recommendations made in the House of Commons’ Justice Committee report published last week, MPs felt the need to add that the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) ‘should be empowered to place more trust in providers’.

All too often the legal aid’s administrative body is a barrier to justice rather than its enabler. It was a theme of our own research in Justice in a Time of Austerity, published in June (Bristol University Press). In the course of a year of interviews, the LAA was variously described as exhibiting a ‘culture of refusal’, being ‘hostile’, ‘punitive’ and ‘having lost all pragmatism’ in its dealings with practitioners. Few tears were shed when the Legal Services Commission was axed under the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) in 2013;

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll